Munson S. S. Line v. Glasgow Navigation Co.

Second Circuit

Munson S. S. Line v. Glasgow Navigation Co.

211 F. 1021, 127 C.C.A. 665, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1831

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 21, 1914

DocketNo. 208

StatusPublished

This text of 211 F. 1021 (Munson S. S. Line v. Glasgow Navigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munson S. S. Line v. Glasgow Navigation Co., 211 F. 1021, 127 C.C.A. 665, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1831 (2d Cir. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The libelant’s motion for leave to file an amended and supplemental libel and to take new proofs in this court is granted, unless the parties stipulate as follows, to wit: The respondent, that it will not set up the defense of laches in the second suit brought by the libelant; and the libelant, that it will discontinue the first suit at its own costs, in which case the motion will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The libelant’s motion for leave to file an amended and supplemental libel and to take new proofs in this court is granted, unless the parties stipulate as follows, to wit: The respondent, that it will not set up the defense of laches in the second suit brought by the libelant; and the libelant, that it will discontinue the first suit at its own costs, in which case the motion will be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 F. 1021, 127 C.C.A. 665, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munson-s-s-line-v-glasgow-navigation-co-ca2-1914.