Munsingwear, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Munsingwear, Inc. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 604

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 25, 1957

DocketReap. Dec. 8945; Entry No. 107

StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 604 (Munsingwear, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munsingwear, Inc. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 604 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted the appeal listed above upon a stipulation to the effect that the market value or price at or about the date of exportation of the subject merchandise, at which such or similar merchandise was freely-offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs and charges specified in section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, was as follows:

Item No. H-llll Can. $16.95 per doz. pair, net packed

Item No. H-1121 Can. $16.95 per doz. pair, net packed

It was further agreed that there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find the proper dutiable foreign value for said merchandise to be as set out above. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted the appeal listed above upon a stipulation to the effect that the market value or price at or about the date of exportation of the subject merchandise, at which such or similar merchandise was freely-offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs and charges specified in section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, was as follows:

Item No. H-llll Can. $16.95 per doz. pair, net packed

Item No. H-1121 Can. $16.95 per doz. pair, net packed

It was further agreed that there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find the proper dutiable foreign value for said merchandise to be as set out above. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Cust. Ct. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munsingwear-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1957.