Munsey v. Whittier Mills Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Munsey v. Whittier Mills Co.

119 S.E. 923, 31 Ga. App. 124, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 777

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1923·No. 14220·Published

Opinion

Bloodworti-i, J.

In the case of Whittier Mills v. Jenkins, 23 Ga. App. 328 (1) (98 S. E. 236), this court held that “the petition set forth a cause of action, and the court did not err in refusing to dismiss the case on oral motion.” The allegations of the petition in this case are so very similar to those in the Jenkins case, as shown by the record filed in the office of the clerk of this court, that the ruling in that case is absolutely controlling in this; and the court erred in dismissing this case on oral motion.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworti-i, J.

In the case of Whittier Mills v. Jenkins, 23 Ga. App. 328 (1) (98 S. E. 236), this court held that “the petition set forth a cause of action, and the court did not err in refusing to dismiss the case on oral motion.” The allegations of the petition in this case are so very similar to those in the Jenkins case, as shown by the record filed in the office of the clerk of this court, that the ruling in that case is absolutely controlling in this; and the court erred in dismissing this case on oral motion.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Munsey v. Whittier Mills Co., 119 S.E. 923, 31 Ga. App. 124, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 777 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

119 S.E. 923 (Munsey v. Whittier Mills Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related