Munroe v. Walbridge
2 Aik. 410
Opinion
dissentiente. He said, that to sustain the petition in this case, was indulging the mortgagees in a very useless proceeding--~That he had made up his mind at the last term, that the non-suit ought not to be set aside, and he had seen no reason to alter his opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Munroe v. Walbridge, 2 Aik. 410 (Vt. 1827).
2 Aik. 410 (Munroe v. Walbridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard Stratthaus
2016 VT 5 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2016)
McMath v. DeBardelaben
75 Ala. 68 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)
Foust v. Moorman
2 Ind. 17 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1850)
Hawley v. Soper
18 Vt. 320 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1846)