Munroe v. Walbridge

2 Aik. 410
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided February 15, 1827·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Prentiss, J.

dissentiente. He said, that to sustain the petition in this case, was indulging the mortgagees in a very useless proceeding--~That he had made up his mind at the last term, that the non-suit ought not to be set aside, and he had seen no reason to alter his opinion.

Skinner, Ch. J. having been of counsel, did not sit in the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Munroe v. Walbridge, 2 Aik. 410 (Vt. 1827).

2 Aik. 410 (Munroe v. Walbridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard Stratthaus
2016 VT 5 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2016)
McMath v. DeBardelaben
75 Ala. 68 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)
Foust v. Moorman
2 Ind. 17 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1850)
Hawley v. Soper
18 Vt. 320 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1846)