Munroe v. Haas

Supreme Court of Georgia

Munroe v. Haas

30 S.E. 654, 105 Ga. 468, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 552

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 24, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 S.E. 654 (Munroe v. Haas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munroe v. Haas, 30 S.E. 654, 105 Ga. 468, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 552 (Ga. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Little, J.

Where, upon the trial in a justice’s court of an action upon a promissory note signed by a husband and wife, there was affirmative and uncontradicted evidence that the latter, in signing, contracted as a surety only, which fact was known to the agent of the payee by whom the note was taken, a verdict against the wife was contrary to law, and the superior court erred in not setting it aside op. certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

All concurring, except Gobb, J., absent.

Certiorari. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior Court. January term, 1897.

J3. S. Griffith, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI