Munroe Regional Health System, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Munroe Regional Health System, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration

816 So. 2d 246, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6644, 2002 WL 992155

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 16, 2002

DocketNo. 1D02-0322

StatusPublished

This text of 816 So. 2d 246 (Munroe Regional Health System, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munroe Regional Health System, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 816 So. 2d 246, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6644, 2002 WL 992155 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the February 21, 2002, order to show cause, and the appellees’ reply thereto, we dismiss this appeal as premature because there are related claims pending below. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 100 (Fla.1974); Odham v. Mouat, 484 So.2d 95, 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Furthermore, where the Office of the Attorney General brings a complaint on behalf of an agency or department of the state, that agency or department is the real party in interest and is a party to the litigation. See generally, State ex rel. Butterworth v. Anclote Manor Hosp., Inc., 566 So.2d 296, 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (dismissing as a party to the litigation corporation on whose behalf the Attorney General had brought suit). The Office of Attorney General filed the pending complaint on behalf of the Agency for Health Care Administration. Therefore, the order on appeal did not totally dispose of the entire case as to any party.

BARFIELD, KAHN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the February 21, 2002, order to show cause, and the appellees’ reply thereto, we dismiss this appeal as premature because there are related claims pending below. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 100 (Fla.1974); Odham v. Mouat, 484 So.2d 95, 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Furthermore, where the Office of the Attorney General brings a complaint on behalf of an agency or department of the state, that agency or department is the real party in interest and is a party to the litigation. See generally, State ex rel. Butterworth v. Anclote Manor Hosp., Inc., 566 So.2d 296, 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (dismissing as a party to the litigation corporation on whose behalf the Attorney General had brought suit). The Office of Attorney General filed the pending complaint on behalf of the Agency for Health Care Administration. Therefore, the order on appeal did not totally dispose of the entire case as to any party.

BARFIELD, KAHN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 246, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6644, 2002 WL 992155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munroe-regional-health-system-inc-v-agency-for-health-care-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack