Munro Drydock, Incorporated v. M/V Heron

612 F.2d 1338
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 1980
Docket79-1160
StatusPublished

This text of 612 F.2d 1338 (Munro Drydock, Incorporated v. M/V Heron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Munro Drydock, Incorporated v. M/V Heron, 612 F.2d 1338 (1st Cir. 1980).

Opinion

612 F.2d 1338

MUNRO DRYDOCK, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
M/V HERON, Her Engines, Equipment, and Tackle, Apparel,
Furniture, and Associated Marine Services, Inc.,
Defendants, Appellees.
Appeal of UNITED STATES of America.

No. 79-1160.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Argued Sept. 12, 1979.
Decided Jan. 22, 1980.

Appeal from United States District Court, District of Massachusetts; Joseph L. Tauro, U. S. District Judge. [467 F.Supp. 513].

Emmett B. Lewis, Atty., C. D., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., with whom Barbara Allen Babcock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Edward F. Harrington, U. S. Atty., Boston, Mass. and William Kanter, Atty., C. D., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., were on brief, for appellant.

Edward F. Harrington, New Bedford, Mass., for plaintiff, appellee, Edward Sanchez, Jr.

Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge, and DOOLING,* Senior District Judge.

DOOLING, District Judge.

This case is in this court for a second time, on appeal from a second order confirming the sale of the M/V Heron on September 12, 1978, to appellee Edward Sanchez, Jr., for $7,500.1 Regrettably this second confirmation order must be reversed; the proceedings leading to the order were based upon a very material misconstruction of the order of this court remanding the case to the district court for action not inconsistent with the court's opinion. Munro Drydock, Inc. v. M/V Heron, 585 F.2d 13 (1st Cir. 1978).

The order of confirmation is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings before a different district judge consistent with the unpublished opinion that has been issued.

Vacated and remanded.

*

Of the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munro Drydock, Incorporated v. M/V Heron
585 F.2d 13 (First Circuit, 1978)
Munro Drydock, Inc. v. M/V HERON
467 F. Supp. 513 (D. Massachusetts, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
612 F.2d 1338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munro-drydock-incorporated-v-mv-heron-ca1-1980.