Munoz v. Suntrust Bank

Fourth Circuit

Munoz v. Suntrust Bank

674 F. App'x 321

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2017·No. No. 16-1766·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Munoz appeals the district court’s order granting SunTrust Bank’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Munoz’s civil action for lack of prudential standing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Munoz v. Suntrust Bank, No. 5:15-ev-00119-RLV-DCK, 2016 WL 3176594 (W.D.N.C. June 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Munoz appeals the district court’s order granting SunTrust Bank’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Munoz’s civil action for lack of prudential standing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Munoz v. Suntrust Bank, No. 5:15-ev-00119-RLV-DCK, 2016 WL 3176594 (W.D.N.C. June 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Munoz v. Suntrust Bank, 674 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

674 F. App'x 321 (Munoz v. Suntrust Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.