Munoz v. Suntrust Bank
This text of 674 F. App'x 321 (Munoz v. Suntrust Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Michael Munoz appeals the district court’s order granting SunTrust Bank’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Munoz’s civil action for lack of prudential standing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Munoz v. Suntrust Bank, No. 5:15-ev-00119-RLV-DCK, 2016 WL 3176594 (W.D.N.C. June 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
674 F. App'x 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munoz-v-suntrust-bank-ca4-2017.