Munoz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Munoz v. State

809 S.W.2d 501, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 123, 1991 WL 87592

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 29, 1991

DocketNos. 333-91 to 335-91

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 809 S.W.2d 501 (Munoz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munoz v. State, 809 S.W.2d 501, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 123, 1991 WL 87592 (Tex. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In a single trial, a jury convicted appellant of three separate offenses against three separate victims, attempted sexual assault and two aggravated sexual assaults. The jury assessed punishment at confinement for life for each of the aggravated sexual assault cases. The Court of [502]*502Appeals affirmed the conviction. Munoz v. State, 803 S.W.2d 755 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1991).

Appellant raises two grounds for review. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

MALONEY, J., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI