Munoz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Munoz v. State

599 So. 2d 283, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6639, 1992 WL 123503

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 9, 1992

DocketNo. 91-871

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 599 So. 2d 283 (Munoz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munoz v. State, 599 So. 2d 283, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6639, 1992 WL 123503 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole point on appeal from the appellant’s conviction for trafficking in cocaine concerns an alleged Richardson violation. The record shows that the state committed no violation of its discovery obligations; thus, no requirement of a Richardson inquiry ever arose. See Palmer v. State, 483 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1152 (Fla.1986); Denny v. State, 404 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole point on appeal from the appellant’s conviction for trafficking in cocaine concerns an alleged Richardson violation. The record shows that the state committed no violation of its discovery obligations; thus, no requirement of a Richardson inquiry ever arose. See Palmer v. State, 483 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1152 (Fla.1986); Denny v. State, 404 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

599 So. 2d 283, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6639, 1992 WL 123503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munoz-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack