Munoz v. State
599 So. 2d 283, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6639, 1992 WL 123503
Opinion
The sole point on appeal from the appellant’s conviction for trafficking in cocaine concerns an alleged Richardson violation. The record shows that the state committed no violation of its discovery obligations; thus, no requirement of a Richardson inquiry ever arose. See Palmer v. State, 483 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1152 (Fla.1986); Denny v. State, 404 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Munoz v. State, 599 So. 2d 283, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6639, 1992 WL 123503 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
599 So. 2d 283 (Munoz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tapia v. State
650 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)