Munoz v. Joslin

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 21, 2007·No. 06-11322·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-11322 Conference Calendar

FELICIANO MUNOZ

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

DAN JOSLIN, Warden Federal Correctional Institute

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CV-400

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Feliciano Munoz, federal prisoner # 23556-077, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. Munoz challenges his 1993 convictions for violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 843(b) and 846. Munoz seeks relief pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Munoz’s claims do not fall under the savings clause of

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-11322

28 U.S.C. § 2255; thus, he may not pursue relief under § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir. 2005); Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Munoz v. Joslin, (5th Cir. 2007).

Munoz v. Joslin (Munoz v. Joslin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. United States
416 F.3d 424 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United States
243 F.3d 893 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)