Munoz ex rel. Munoz v. Tobin

653 So. 2d 514, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4397, 1995 WL 238833
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1995·No. No. 95-489·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition challenging respondent’s denial of a motion for disqualification. Because our review of the record reveals that the judge’s comments constituted an impermissible challenge to the truth of the allegations in the motion to disqualify, we are compelled to grant the petition. See MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332 (Fla.1990); Hill v. Feder, 564 So.2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Management Corp. of Am. v. Grossman, Inc., 396 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Petition for writ of prohibition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Munoz ex rel. Munoz v. Tobin, 653 So. 2d 514, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4397, 1995 WL 238833 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

653 So. 2d 514 (Munoz ex rel. Munoz v. Tobin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Feder
564 So. 2d 609 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.
565 So. 2d 1332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Management Corp. of America, Inc. v. Grossman
396 So. 2d 1169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)