Munn v. State
77 S.E. 591, 12 Ga. App. 479, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 594
Opinion
While the evidence of the defendant’s guilt of larceny was weak, still the testimony was sufficient to authorize the jury to infer that the accused entertained the animus furandi when he borrowed the prosecutor’s watch. Rice v. State, 6 Ca. App. 160 (64 S. E. 575); Bryant v. State, 8 Ga. App. 389 (69 S. E. 121); Martin v. State, 123 Ga. 478 (51 S. E. 334). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Munn v. State, 77 S.E. 591, 12 Ga. App. 479, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 594 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).
77 S.E. 591 (Munn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
C. L. Fain Co. v. Baltimore American Ins.
57 S.E.2d 879 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Great American Insurance Company v. Gusman
56 S.E.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Hix v. State
137 S.E. 413 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Maxwell v. State
103 S.E. 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)