Munn v. North Carolina State University
626 S.E.2d 270, 360 N.C. 353, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 10
Opinion
As to the issue on direct appeal, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Munn v. North Carolina State University, 626 S.E.2d 270, 360 N.C. 353, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 10 (N.C. 2006).
626 S.E.2d 270 (Munn v. North Carolina State University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKinley Building Corp. v. Alvis
645 S.E.2d 219 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Dogwood Development & Management Co. v. White Oak Transport Co.
645 S.E.2d 212 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
State v. Hart
644 S.E.2d 201 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
Blevins v. Town of West Jefferson
643 S.E.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
In re C.T.
641 S.E.2d 414 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Ribble v. Ribble
637 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
Stann v. Levine
636 S.E.2d 214 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
Walsh v. Town of Wrightsville Beach Board of Alderman
632 S.E.2d 271 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Hart
633 S.E.2d 102 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Summers
629 S.E.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)