Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Munn v. Horizons Development, Inc.

Munn v. Horizons Development, Inc.

616 So. 2d 85, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2993, 1993 WL 74266
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 17, 1993
DocketNo. 92-0036
StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 85 (Munn v. Horizons Development, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Munn v. Horizons Development, Inc., 616 So. 2d 85, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2993, 1993 WL 74266 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in dismissing their tort action on the grounds that they had failed to join an indispensable party, an alleged additional tortfeasor. See Dulman v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., Co., 308 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Fincher Motor Sales, Inc. v. Lakin, 156 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). Under these cases an injured party has the discretion to determine and sue those potential tortfeasors who may be jointly or severally liable for that party’s injuries.

ANSTEAD, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fincher Motor Sales, Inc. v. Lakin
156 So. 2d 672 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Dulman v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
308 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 85, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2993, 1993 WL 74266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munn-v-horizons-development-inc-fladistctapp-1993.