Munn v. Horizons Development, Inc.
616 So. 2d 85, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2993, 1993 WL 74266
Opinion
REVERSED. We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in dismissing their tort action on the grounds that they had failed to join an indispensable party, an alleged additional tortfeasor. See Dulman v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., Co., 308 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Fincher Motor Sales, Inc. v. Lakin, 156 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). Under these cases an injured party has the discretion to determine and sue those potential tortfeasors who may be jointly or severally liable for that party’s injuries.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Munn v. Horizons Development, Inc., 616 So. 2d 85, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2993, 1993 WL 74266 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
616 So. 2d 85 (Munn v. Horizons Development, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fincher Motor Sales, Inc. v. Lakin
156 So. 2d 672 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Dulman v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
308 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)