Munly v. State
7 Blackf. 593, 1845 Ind. LEXIS 146
Opinion
THE defendant’s right, in the case of an indictment, to challenge a juror peremptorily, remains open until the juror is sworn. See Beauchamp v. The State, 6 Blackf. 299.—1 Chitt. C. L. 545.—Hooker v. The State, 4 Ohio, 348.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Munly v. State, 7 Blackf. 593, 1845 Ind. LEXIS 146 (Ind. 1845).
7 Blackf. 593 (Munly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hunter
92 N.W. 872 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Republic of Hawaii v. Kapea
11 Haw. 293 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1898)
Kurtz v. State
42 N.E. 1102 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)
State v. Pritchard
15 Nev. 74 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1880)
Baker v. State
3 Tex. Ct. App. 525 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)
Lindsley v. People
6 Park. Cr. 233 (New York Supreme Court, 1867)