Munitz v. Munitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Munitz v. Munitz

281 A.D. 895, 119 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 895 (Munitz v. Munitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munitz v. Munitz, 281 A.D. 895, 119 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Order (1) granting defendant’s motion to vacate an order modifying a judgment of separation by incorporating therein a provision enjoining defendant from prosecuting a divorce action without this State, and (2) denying plaintiff’s cross motion for allowance for counsel fee affirmed, without costs. The court was without jurisdiction to make the order enjoining the defendant in the light of the fact that a final judgment of separation had been entered prior thereto. (Long v. Long, 196 Mise. 982, 277 App. Div. 1033, motion for leave to appeal dismissed 302 N. T. 700; Bavaud v. Bavaud, 273 App. Div. 507; Duckworth v. Duckworth, 200 Mise. 10.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MaeCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order (1) granting defendant’s motion to vacate an order modifying a judgment of separation by incorporating therein a provision enjoining defendant from prosecuting a divorce action without this State, and (2) denying plaintiff’s cross motion for allowance for counsel fee affirmed, without costs. The court was without jurisdiction to make the order enjoining the defendant in the light of the fact that a final judgment of separation had been entered prior thereto. (Long v. Long, 196 Mise. 982, 277 App. Div. 1033, motion for leave to appeal dismissed 302 N. T. 700; Bavaud v. Bavaud, 273 App. Div. 507; Duckworth v. Duckworth, 200 Mise. 10.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MaeCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 895, 119 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munitz-v-munitz-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack