Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co. v. Ward

Second Circuit

Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co. v. Ward

138 F. 1006, 70 C.C.A. 284, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3845

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 23, 1905·No. No. 216·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not think it necessary to add anything to the opinion of the Circuit Judge. The evidence entirely warrants the finding of facts therein set forth, and upon those facts we fully concur in the conclusion that the dealings between plaintiff and its correspondents were dealings between principals and independent of the correspondents’ dealings, each with his own customers. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We do not think it necessary to add anything to the opinion of the Circuit Judge. The evidence entirely warrants the finding of facts therein set forth, and upon those facts we fully concur in the conclusion that the dealings between plaintiff and its correspondents were dealings between principals and independent of the correspondents’ dealings, each with his own customers. The judgment is affirmed.

Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co. v. Ward, 138 F. 1006, 70 C.C.A. 284, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3845 (2d Cir. 1905).

Pincite

138 F. 1006 (Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co. v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related