Municipal Metallic Bed Manufacturing Corp. v. Dobbs

228 A.D. 659
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1929
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D. 659 (Municipal Metallic Bed Manufacturing Corp. v. Dobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Municipal Metallic Bed Manufacturing Corp. v. Dobbs, 228 A.D. 659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

— Order denying motion to dismiss complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The purpose for which the lease was made, it is not disputed, is illegal and no recovery, under the circumstances, may be predicated thereon. (Hart v. City Theatres Co., 215 N. Y. 322; Raner v. Goldberg, 215 App. Div. 355.) The alleged misrepresentation cannot be said to be a fraud, because it is but an expression of opinion as to the law. Rich, Seeger and Seudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent and vote to affirm, as the plaintiff was not limited in the kind of use of the premises. (See Raner v. Goldberg, 215 App. Div. 355.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart v. . City Theatres Co.
109 N.E. 497 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Raner v. Goldberg
215 A.D. 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/municipal-metallic-bed-manufacturing-corp-v-dobbs-nyappdiv-1929.