Municipal Bank v. Parkway Walk Construction Corp.

224 A.D. 864
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order modified by denying the motion for judgment on the pleadings and by denying the motion to strike out denials relating to paragraphs 12,13 and 14 of the complaint, and as thus modified the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Under rule 104 the burden of establishing that these denials were sham was upon the plaintiff. (Carmody’s N. Y. Prac. § 291; People v. McCumber, 18 N. Y. 315.) These denials did not relate to matters of which defendant Gelband had personal knowledge or with respect to which he had constructive knowledge. The denials, therefore, were not presumptively false and there is no showing in the record that they were in fact false. La.zansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Municipal Bank v. Parkway Walk Construction Corp., 224 A.D. 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

224 A.D. 864 (Municipal Bank v. Parkway Walk Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burr v. Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores, Inc.
21 Misc. 2d 877 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Long Island Trust Co. v. Merz
20 Misc. 2d 342 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)