MUNGOVAN, MICHELLE v. MUNGOVAN, DAVID

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 2016
DocketCA 15-02117
StatusPublished

This text of MUNGOVAN, MICHELLE v. MUNGOVAN, DAVID (MUNGOVAN, MICHELLE v. MUNGOVAN, DAVID) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MUNGOVAN, MICHELLE v. MUNGOVAN, DAVID, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1148 CA 15-02117 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

MICHELLE MUNGOVAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID MUNGOVAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

LAWRENCE P. BROWN, BRIDGEPORT, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Martha E. Mulroy, A.J.), entered October 22, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the application of plaintiff for attorney’s fees in this post judgment matrimonial proceeding.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff, as limited by her brief, appeals from that part of an order that denied her request for counsel fees in this postjudgment matrimonial proceeding. Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, considering all of the circumstances of this case, including the nature and extent of the services that were required to resolve the dispute and “ ‘the reasonableness of counsel’s performance under the circumstances’ ” (McArthur v Bell, 201 AD2d 974, 974, lv dismissed 83 NY2d 906, lv denied 85 NY2d 809; see generally DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881), we conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s request for counsel fees (see generally Wilson v Wilson, 128 AD3d 1326, 1327).

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete
518 N.E.2d 1168 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
McArthur v. Bell
201 A.D.2d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Wilson v. Wilson
128 A.D.3d 1326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MUNGOVAN, MICHELLE v. MUNGOVAN, DAVID, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mungovan-michelle-v-mungovan-david-nyappdiv-2016.