Mungin v. State

677 So. 2d 958, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8037, 1996 WL 426418
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1996·No. No. 95-02159·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the appellant’s attorney has brought to the court’s attention the failure of the trial judge to reduce to writing his decision to impose adult sanctions upon Mun-gin, a juvenile at the time of the offense. Although the trial court no longer needs to make specific factual findings under the 1994 version of section 39.057, Florida Statutes, the court nevertheless must render a written order noting its decision. § 39.059(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994); Collins v. State, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1400, — So.2d — (Fla. 2d DCA June 12, 1996); Lunn v. State, 675 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing. The court may again sentence Mungin as an adult after compliance with section 39.059, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994).

THREADGILL, C.J., and LAZZARA, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mungin v. State, 677 So. 2d 958, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8037, 1996 WL 426418 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

677 So. 2d 958 (Mungin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hardwick v. State
677 So. 2d 958 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)