Mungin v. Mungin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Mungin v. Mungin

134 S.E. 238, 166 S.C. 43, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 116

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMay 30, 1932

Docket13417

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 238 (Mungin v. Mungin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mungin v. Mungin, 134 S.E. 238, 166 S.C. 43, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 116 (S.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Brease.

The appeal here is on the part of the defendant from an order of his Honor, Circuit Judge Grimball, allowing temporary alimony and attorney’s fees to the plaintiff. It is not necessary to cite authorities to sustain the well-settled rule that the allowance of temporary alimony and attorney’s fees is within the discretion of the Circuit Judge, and it is incumbent upon the appellant to show an abuse of discretion on the part of the Judge in his conclusions. There has been ik> such showing here; so the order' appealed from is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices StabrEr, Carter and Bonham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Brease.

The appeal here is on the part of the defendant from an order of his Honor, Circuit Judge Grimball, allowing temporary alimony and attorney’s fees to the plaintiff. It is not necessary to cite authorities to sustain the well-settled rule that the allowance of temporary alimony and attorney’s fees is within the discretion of the Circuit Judge, and it is incumbent upon the appellant to show an abuse of discretion on the part of the Judge in his conclusions. There has been ik> such showing here; so the order' appealed from is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices StabrEr, Carter and Bonham concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.E. 238, 166 S.C. 43, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mungin-v-mungin-sc-1932.