Munford Rubber Tire Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
This text of 130 F. 496 (Munford Rubber Tire Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff is a citizen of Georgia; the defendants are citizens of other states, none of them being a citizen of Georgia. We hate then a controversy wholly between citizens of different states. I am unable to distinguish this case from Ins. Co. v. Champlin (C. C.) 21 Fed. 85. Subsequently followed in this circuit in Garner v. Bank (C. C.) 66 Fed. 369, and Trust Co. v. Mackay, 70 Fed. 801.
The motion to remand is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 F. 496, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munford-rubber-tire-co-v-consolidated-rubber-tire-co-circtsdny-1904.