Muneeb v. Qi-Ziong Cen

6 A.D.3d 678, 775 N.Y.S.2d 176

This text of 6 A.D.3d 678 (Muneeb v. Qi-Ziong Cen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muneeb v. Qi-Ziong Cen, 6 A.D.3d 678, 775 N.Y.S.2d 176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), entered February 27, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendants and against them, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention on appeal, the conduct of the trial court did not deny them a fair trial (see Malaty v North Ark. Wholesale Co., 305 AD2d 556 [2003]; Sheinkerman v 3111 Ocean Parkway Assoc., 259 AD2d 480 [1999]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions either are without merit or are unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J.E, S. Miller, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheinkerman v. 3111 Ocean Parkway Associates
259 A.D.2d 480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Malaty v. North Arkansas Wholesale Co.
305 A.D.2d 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.3d 678, 775 N.Y.S.2d 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muneeb-v-qi-ziong-cen-nyappdiv-2004.