Mundy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Mundy v. State

1912 OK CR 363, 124 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 746, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 9, 1912

DocketNo. A-1460.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 363 (Mundy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mundy v. State, 1912 OK CR 363, 124 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 746, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Pottawatomie county for unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquors from one place in the county to another place in said county, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of fifty dollars and thirty days’ confinement in the county jail. The issues involved were clearly submitted to the jury in the instructions of the court. The jury are the exclusive judges of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. As the jury has seen fit to accept the testimony of the state and reject the testimony of the appellant, we cannot do otherwise than affirm this conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Pottawatomie county for unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquors from one place in the county to another place in said county, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of fifty dollars and thirty days’ confinement in the county jail. The issues involved were clearly submitted to the jury in the instructions of the court. The jury are the exclusive judges of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. As the jury has seen fit to accept the testimony of the state and reject the testimony of the appellant, we cannot do otherwise than affirm this conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 363, 124 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 746, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mundy-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.