Mundy v. Mundy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mundy v. Mundy

152 S.E.2d 831, 114 Ga. App. 788, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 918

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 2, 1966

Docket42244

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 S.E.2d 831 (Mundy v. Mundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mundy v. Mundy, 152 S.E.2d 831, 114 Ga. App. 788, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 918 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

“Where there is only an appeal from a jury verdict, there is nothing to review, and the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction since it is a court for the correction of errors of law alone. Code Ann. §§ 2-3704, 2-3708 (Ga. L. 1945, Const, of 1945 [Art. VI, Sec. II, Pars. IV, VIII]); Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965).” Interstate Fire Ins. Co. v. Chattam, 222 Ga. 436 (150 SE2d 618). The appeal in the present case is from the verdict of a jury rendered in the Superior Court of Fulton County on an appeal from the court of ordinary. No judgment, order, or ruling of the judge is referred to. Upon application of the ruling in the above Supreme Court decision in answer to a certified question from this court, the present appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pannell, Judge.

“Where there is only an appeal from a jury verdict, there is nothing to review, and the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction since it is a court for the correction of errors of law alone. Code Ann. §§ 2-3704, 2-3708 (Ga. L. 1945, Const, of 1945 [Art. VI, Sec. II, Pars. IV, VIII]); Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965).” Interstate Fire Ins. Co. v. Chattam, 222 Ga. 436 (150 SE2d 618). The appeal in the present case is from the verdict of a jury rendered in the Superior Court of Fulton County on an appeal from the court of ordinary. No judgment, order, or ruling of the judge is referred to. Upon application of the ruling in the above Supreme Court decision in answer to a certified question from this court, the present appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 S.E.2d 831, 114 Ga. App. 788, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mundy-v-mundy-gactapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack