Mundorff v. Singer
5 Watts 172
Opinion
It is impossible to distinguish this case from the United States v. Simpson, or to perceive an equity on which the surety might be discharged.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mundorff v. Singer, 5 Watts 172 (Pa. 1836).
5 Watts 172 (Mundorff v. Singer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miners Bank v. Ingham
17 Pa. D. & C. 740 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1932)
Whitehouse v. American Surety Co.
90 N.W. 727 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Joyce v. Cockrill
92 F. 838 (Sixth Circuit, 1899)
Jerauld v. Trippet
62 Ind. 122 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Ray v. Brenner
12 Kan. 105 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1873)
Baker v. Davis
22 N.H. 27 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)