Mundo v. SMS Hasenclever Maschinenfabrik

New York Court of Appeals

Mundo v. SMS Hasenclever Maschinenfabrik

88 N.Y.2d 1014

DecidedSeptember 19, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.Y.2d 1014 (Mundo v. SMS Hasenclever Maschinenfabrik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mundo v. SMS Hasenclever Maschinenfabrik, 88 N.Y.2d 1014 (N.Y. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 14, 1996 Appellate Division order that denied appellants’ motion for reargument or, alternatively, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and from so much of the Appellate Division’s February 27, 1996 order as affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellants’ motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that the May 14, 1996 order and the above-stated portion of the February 27, 1996 order do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 14, 1996 Appellate Division order that denied appellants’ motion for reargument or, alternatively, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and from so much of the Appellate Division’s February 27, 1996 order as affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellants’ motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that the May 14, 1996 order and the above-stated portion of the February 27, 1996 order do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 N.Y.2d 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mundo-v-sms-hasenclever-maschinenfabrik-ny-1996.