Mundet Cork Corp. v. Grupp
154 Misc. 798, 278 N.Y.S. 231, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1036
Opinion
The holder of a note in due course is not bound by a payment made to a prior holder after the transfer of the note. Such a payment is made at the peril of the one making it. (Carr v. Lewis, 20 N. Y. 138; First National Bank of Bridgeport v. Blackman, 249 id. 322.)
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the plaintiff for the amount claimed in the summons.
All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mundet Cork Corp. v. Grupp, 154 Misc. 798, 278 N.Y.S. 231, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
154 Misc. 798 (Mundet Cork Corp. v. Grupp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Unadilla National Bank v. McQueer
27 A.D.2d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Industrial Bank of Commerce v. Hayse
191 Misc. 658 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1948)