Mundet Cork Corp. v. Grupp

154 Misc. 798, 278 N.Y.S. 231, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1036
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 154 Misc. 798 (Mundet Cork Corp. v. Grupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mundet Cork Corp. v. Grupp, 154 Misc. 798, 278 N.Y.S. 231, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The holder of a note in due course is not bound by a payment made to a prior holder after the transfer of the note. Such a payment is made at the peril of the one making it. (Carr v. Lewis, 20 N. Y. 138; First National Bank of Bridgeport v. Blackman, 249 id. 322.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the plaintiff for the amount claimed in the summons.

All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Unadilla National Bank v. McQueer
27 A.D.2d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Industrial Bank of Commerce v. Hayse
191 Misc. 658 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 Misc. 798, 278 N.Y.S. 231, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mundet-cork-corp-v-grupp-nyappterm-1935.