Munden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Munden v. State

152 S.W.2d 755

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 25, 1941

DocketNo. 21673

StatusPublished

This text of 152 S.W.2d 755 (Munden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munden v. State, 152 S.W.2d 755 (Tex. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.-

The appellant was duly convicted of the offense of burglary by a grand jury in Gregg County.

[756]*756The indictment sets out a number of previous offenses as a proper basis for alleging that appellant was an habitual criminal. The jury returned its verdict finding him guilty on the second count of the indictment and judgment was entered assessing his punishment as life imprisonment.

The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception. The procedure appears to be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.-

The appellant was duly convicted of the offense of burglary by a grand jury in Gregg County.

[756]*756The indictment sets out a number of previous offenses as a proper basis for alleging that appellant was an habitual criminal. The jury returned its verdict finding him guilty on the second count of the indictment and judgment was entered assessing his punishment as life imprisonment.

The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception. The procedure appears to be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 S.W.2d 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munden-v-state-texcrimapp-1941.