Muncy v. LINDMARK

Missouri Court of Appeals

Muncy v. LINDMARK

236 S.W.3d 125, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1467, 2007 WL 3071802

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 23, 2007

DocketED 89376

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 S.W.3d 125 (Muncy v. LINDMARK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muncy v. LINDMARK, 236 S.W.3d 125, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1467, 2007 WL 3071802 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Charles and Lisa Muncy, appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Marvin Lindmark, by the Circuit Court of St. Charles County on the plaintiffs’ claim of legal malpractice arising from the plaintiffs’ sale of real estate to the City of O’Fallon. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI