Muncy v. LINDMARK

236 S.W.3d 125, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1467, 2007 WL 3071802
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 2007·No. ED 89376·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Charles and Lisa Muncy, appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Marvin Lindmark, by the Circuit Court of St. Charles County on the plaintiffs’ claim of legal malpractice arising from the plaintiffs’ sale of real estate to the City of O’Fallon. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muncy v. LINDMARK, 236 S.W.3d 125, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1467, 2007 WL 3071802 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

236 S.W.3d 125 (Muncy v. LINDMARK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Davis
236 S.W.3d 125 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)