Munch v. State

634 So. 2d 679, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1822, 1994 WL 63295
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 1994·No. No. 93-1006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s conviction for armed robbery is affirmed. However, as the state concedes, the trial court erred in failing to award the defendant credit for time served in jail prior to sentencing. See § 921.161, Fla. Stat. The defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for computation of jail time credit. See Arnette v. State, 593 So.2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

[680]*680CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; AND CAUSE REMANDED.

COBB, PETERSON and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Munch v. State, 634 So. 2d 679, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1822, 1994 WL 63295 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

634 So. 2d 679 (Munch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diaz v. State
695 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)