Munch Brewery, Inc. v. Brooklyn Beverage Dealers Ass'n

234 A.D. 797

This text of 234 A.D. 797 (Munch Brewery, Inc. v. Brooklyn Beverage Dealers Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Munch Brewery, Inc. v. Brooklyn Beverage Dealers Ass'n, 234 A.D. 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The denial of the motion was proper. A granting of the motion would have been a violation of the rule that one Special Term justice may not exercise appellate jurisdiction over another justice of co-ordinate jurisdiction. The anomalous situation herein, however, requires that this case be placed at the head of the Special Term calendar five days after the entry of the order herein, subject to the approval of the justice presiding. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munch-brewery-inc-v-brooklyn-beverage-dealers-assn-nyappdiv-1931.