Mumuni v. Eagle Insurance

247 A.D.2d 315, 668 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1609
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered January 23, 1997, which, in an action to determine insurance coverage, insofar as appealed from, declared that defendant-appellant’s policy was in effect at the time of the accident, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The accident occurred on December 31, 1988 at 9:00 a.m. Defendant-respondent’s policy with the insured expired as of 12:01 a.m. on December 31, 1988; defendant-appellant’s policy with the insured was effective “from 12/31/88 midnight to 12/ 31/89 midnight”. We agree with the IAS Court that the word “midnight” is ambiguous, and that the ambiguity should be construed against defendant-appellant so as to provide coverage as of the termination of defendant-respondent’s policy at 12:01 a.m. (see, Leatherby Ins. Co. v Villafana, 82 Misc 2d 144).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mumuni v. Eagle Insurance, 247 A.D.2d 315, 668 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 315 (Mumuni v. Eagle Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re City of Detroit
504 B.R. 97 (E.D. Michigan, 2013)
American Transit Insurance v. Wilfred
296 A.D.2d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)