Mumpower v. England

292 F. App'x 567
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 8, 2008·No. No. 07-55037·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Edward G. Mumpower appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action for failure to serve the summons and complaint in a timely manner. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Townsel v. County of Contra Costa, 820 F.2d 319, 320 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in the context of this case in dismissing Mumpower’s action without prejudice because the circumstances did not compel the conclusion that his attorney’s admitted failure to review the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure excused his failure to effect timely service. See id. (holding that counsel’s ignorance of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure does not constitute good cause).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mumpower v. England, 292 F. App'x 567 (9th Cir. 2008).

292 F. App'x 567 (Mumpower v. England) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Townsel v. County Of Contra Costa
820 F.2d 319 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)