Mumphrey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Mumphrey v. State

780 S.W.2d 259, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 187, 1989 WL 125746

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 25, 1989

DocketNo. 1046-89

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 780 S.W.2d 259 (Mumphrey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mumphrey v. State, 780 S.W.2d 259, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 187, 1989 WL 125746 (Tex. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at 35 years in the Texas Department of Corrections after finding appellant had a previous felony conviction. On appeal the Beaumont Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Mumphrey v. State, 774 S.W.2d 75 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1989).

Appellant raises one ground for review. We agree with the Court of Appeals majority that it does not require reversal. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning or language employed by the Court of Appeals majority. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI