Mumford v. Mumford

17 F. Cas. 982, 1 Gall. 366
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island·Decided November 15, 1812·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Parties — Alien Enemy.

An alien enemy cannot sustain a suit in the courts of the United States.

This was a bill in equity [by Joseph Mumford against Henry Mumford], upon the face of which it appeared, that the complainant was an alien enemy, to wit, a subject of the king of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, resident within the realm thereof. It was admitted by the counsel on each side, that the fact was truly stated, and thereupon THE COURT ordered the bill to be dismissed, being of opinion that an alien enemy has no persona standi in judicio, and cannot prosecute any suit in the courts of this country. Daubigny v. Davallon, 2 Anstr. 462. Bill dismissed.

Mr. Burrill, for complainant.

[Reported by íohn Gallison. Esq.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mumford v. Mumford, 17 F. Cas. 982, 1 Gall. 366 (circtdri 1812).

17 F. Cas. 982 (Mumford v. Mumford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russ v. Mitchell
11 Fla. 80 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1865)
Thompson v. Lewis
34 Me. 167 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1852)