Mumford v. Columbian Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Mumford v. Columbian Insurance

2 Cai. Cas. 251

DecidedNovember 15, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 251 (Mumford v. Columbian Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mumford v. Columbian Insurance, 2 Cai. Cas. 251 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

It was ruled, that judgment as in case of nonsuit for not proceeding to trial, must be moved for -the next term after tbe laches, and the practice, according to the case of Brandi v. Buclchout, vol. 1, p. 113, was now confirmed.

N. B. — Sanford (United States Attorney) mentioned, that by the words of the act it might be moved for “ at any time.” But the court paid no attention to the remark.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It was ruled, that judgment as in case of nonsuit for not proceeding to trial, must be moved for -the next term after tbe laches, and the practice, according to the case of Brandi v. Buclchout, vol. 1, p. 113, was now confirmed.

N. B. — Sanford (United States Attorney) mentioned, that by the words of the act it might be moved for “ at any time.” But the court paid no attention to the remark.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cai. Cas. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mumford-v-columbian-insurance-nysupct-1804.