Mulzac v. Roman

276 A.D.2d 679, 716 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 A.D.2d 679 (Mulzac v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mulzac v. Roman, 276 A.D.2d 679, 716 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Gnesin Roman appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated October 21, 1999, as denied his motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant Gnesin Roman, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him, as good cause was shown for the plaintiffs’ delay in entering a judgment. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vigliarolo v. Caesar's Pocono Paradise Stream Resort
16 A.D.3d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 A.D.2d 679, 716 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulzac-v-roman-nyappdiv-2000.