Mulvihill v. Staigel
This text of 123 N.Y.S. 916 (Mulvihill v. Staigel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action was for rent for the month of January, 1910. The defendant tenant occupied and paid for the premises in December, 1909. He said he was going to move out before the 1st of January; but it is uncontradicted that a considerable part of his belongings remained on the premises as late as January 3, 1910. Under these circumstances, there was a plain holding over for the month of January.
Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 N.Y.S. 916, 1910 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulvihill-v-staigel-nyappterm-1910.