Mulvihill v. Hammett

Mississippi Supreme Court

Mulvihill v. Hammett

115 So. 772, 149 Miss. 319, 1928 Miss. LEXIS 65

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 6, 1928

DocketNo. 26812.

StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 772 (Mulvihill v. Hammett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulvihill v. Hammett, 115 So. 772, 149 Miss. 319, 1928 Miss. LEXIS 65 (Mich. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

*322 Anderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The issues of fact in this case were fairly and amply covered by instructions embodying the applicable principles of law.

We find no error in the instructions given for the appellee; nor was the appellant harmed by the refusal of the court of the several instructions requested on his be *323 half, and marked refused in the record. Some of them embodied correct principles of law. One or more did not. Those instructions, refused appellant, which embodied correct principles of law, were without harm to appellant, because the same principles were contained in other instructions given one or the other of the parties.

Affirmed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*322 Anderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The issues of fact in this case were fairly and amply covered by instructions embodying the applicable principles of law.

We find no error in the instructions given for the appellee; nor was the appellant harmed by the refusal of the court of the several instructions requested on his be *323 half, and marked refused in the record. Some of them embodied correct principles of law. One or more did not. Those instructions, refused appellant, which embodied correct principles of law, were without harm to appellant, because the same principles were contained in other instructions given one or the other of the parties.

Affirmed:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 So. 772, 149 Miss. 319, 1928 Miss. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulvihill-v-hammett-miss-1928.