Mulvey v. Williamson
This text of 184 A.D. 949 (Mulvey v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground solely that the finding, [950]*950implied by the verdict, that defendants John S. Williamson and Edward A. Williamson were partners of defendant William L. Williamson on the 21st day of July, 1914, is against the weight of evidence, and the finding of the jury to that effect is reversed, unless plaintiff, within twenty days, stipulate to remit the judgment as against defendants John S. Williamson and Edward A. Williamson. If such stipulation be given, the judgment against William L. Williamson is affirmed, with costs. The judgment cannot be affirmed as to one defendant and reversed and a new trial granted as to the other two. (Bamberg v. International Railway Co., 121 App. Div. 1.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 A.D. 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulvey-v-williamson-nyappdiv-1918.