Multichrome, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 407, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1633
United States Customs Court·Decided December 2, 1952·No. No. 56953; protest 190024-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Multichrome, Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 407, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1633 (cusc 1952).
29 Cust. Ct. 407 (Multichrome, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 40 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)
Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 44 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)