Multi-Pak Sales Corp. v. Comptroller of the City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Multi-Pak Sales Corp. v. Comptroller of the City of New York

212 A.D.2d 408, 622 N.Y.S.2d 41

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.D.2d 408 (Multi-Pak Sales Corp. v. Comptroller of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Multi-Pak Sales Corp. v. Comptroller of the City of New York, 212 A.D.2d 408, 622 N.Y.S.2d 41 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order and determination of respondent the Comptroller of the City of New York, dated June 25, 1991, which found that petitioner’s subcontractor, LaRene Electrical Co., had willfully violated the Labor Law by failing to pay prevailing wages and benefits to six electricians and ordered petitioner, as general contractor, to pay the deficiency, plus interest from the time of underpayment, in the amount of $69,279.23, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, commenced in this Court pursuant to section 220 (8) of the Labor Law, dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner waived its rights to object to the Comptroller’s lengthy delay in prosecuting this matter by entering into a valid settlement, stipulated to on the record by petitioner’s president (see, Matter of Able Med. Transp. v Axelrod, 139 AD2d 921).

We note that the Comptroller is entitled to seek full recourse for the deficiency from petitioner who is responsible for the violations of its subcontractor under Labor Law § 223 (see, Matter of Canarsie Plumbing & Heating Corp. v Goldin, 151 AD2d 331, 333-334).

We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order and determination of respondent the Comptroller of the City of New York, dated June 25, 1991, which found that petitioner’s subcontractor, LaRene Electrical Co., had willfully violated the Labor Law by failing to pay prevailing wages and benefits to six electricians and ordered petitioner, as general contractor, to pay the deficiency, plus interest from the time of underpayment, in the amount of $69,279.23, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, commenced in this Court pursuant to section 220 (8) of the Labor Law, dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner waived its rights to object to the Comptroller’s lengthy delay in prosecuting this matter by entering into a valid settlement, stipulated to on the record by petitioner’s president (see, Matter of Able Med. Transp. v Axelrod, 139 AD2d 921).

We note that the Comptroller is entitled to seek full recourse for the deficiency from petitioner who is responsible for the violations of its subcontractor under Labor Law § 223 (see, Matter of Canarsie Plumbing & Heating Corp. v Goldin, 151 AD2d 331, 333-334).

We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 408, 622 N.Y.S.2d 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/multi-pak-sales-corp-v-comptroller-of-the-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack