Mulstein v. Cohen

247 A.D. 811

Opinion

Order denying motion for an alternative mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars Costs and disbursements, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed as not appealable. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mulstein v. Cohen, 247 A.D. 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

247 A.D. 811 (Mulstein v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.