Mulroy v. Carey
This text of 373 N.E.2d 369 (Mulroy v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice G. Robert Witmer at the Appellate Division (58 AD2d 207).
In affirming, no view is expressed whether in any or all circumstances the exercise of the executive power to supersede an elected District Attorney would be beyond judicial review or correction in a direct or collateral action or proceeding brought or defended by the county or the elected District Attorney involved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
373 N.E.2d 369, 43 N.Y.2d 819, 402 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulroy-v-carey-ny-1977.