Mulrooney v. Par 4 The Crab, Inc.
This text of Mulrooney v. Par 4 The Crab, Inc. (Mulrooney v. Par 4 The Crab, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
PAUL J. MULROONEY, : : C.A. No: K16A-08-001 RBY Appellant, : In and For Kent County : v. : : PAR 4 THE CRAB, INC., and : UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE : APPEALS BOARD, : : Appellees. :
Submitted: January 3, 2017 Decided: January 6, 2017
Upon Consideration of Appellant’s Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board AFFIRMED
ORDER
Paul J. Mulrooney, Sr., Pro se.
Carla A.K. Jarosz, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware for Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board.
Young, J. Mulrooney v. Par 4 The Crab, Inc., et al. C.A. No.: K16A-08-001 RBY January 6, 2017
SUMMARY Claimant, Paul J. Mulrooney, has filed this appeal from the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (“Board”) in Case No. 41032671 rendered on July 26, 2016. FACTS As indicated by the undisputed testimony of Claimant at the hearing of July 13, 2016, Claimant commenced employment with Par 4 The Crab, Inc., as a bartender on June 3, 2016. After working intermittently over the next 8 or 10 days, he received a call from his union to pursue his “career,” as Claimant put it, as an electrician, ending his tenure with Par 4. Following that testimony, the Board affirmed the decision of the Claims Deputy denying unemployment benefits on the basis that the Claimant left his work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the employment at Par 4 The Crab, Inc. Hence, Claimant was determined to be disqualified from the receipt of unemployment benefits pursuant to 19 Del. Code § 3314(1). STANDARD OF REVIEW As indicated in 29 Del. Code § 10142(d), the function of the Superior Court is to decide whether a Board’s conclusions are or are not supported by substantial evidence and free from legal error. DECISION The finding of the Board is entirely free from legal error. Additionally, it is certainly supported by substantial evidence; indeed by the unrefuted evidence supplied exclusively by Claimant himself.
2 Mulrooney v. Par 4 The Crab, Inc., et al. C.A. No.: K16A-08-001 RBY January 6, 2017
Accordingly, the Decision of the Board of July 26, 2016 in Case No. 41032671 is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert B. Young J.
RBY/lmc Via File & ServeXpress oc: Prothonotary cc: Counsel Paul Mulrooney (via U.S. Mail)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mulrooney v. Par 4 The Crab, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulrooney-v-par-4-the-crab-inc-delsuperct-2017.