Mulqueen v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Company
105 N.E. 1091, 211 N.Y. 561, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1153
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Werner, His-cock, Chase, Cuddeback and Cardozo, JJ. Not sitting: Miller, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mulqueen v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Company, 105 N.E. 1091, 211 N.Y. 561, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1153 (N.Y. 1914).
105 N.E. 1091 (Mulqueen v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.