Mulqueen v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
148 A.D. 915, 132 N.Y.S. 1125
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1912
StatusPublished
This text of 148 A.D. 915 (Mulqueen v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mulqueen v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 148 A.D. 915, 132 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
Opinion
—Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. (McLaughlin, J., dissented on the ground that the relation of master and servant did not exist at the time of the injury.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 A.D. 915, 132 N.Y.S. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulqueen-v-interborough-rapid-transit-co-nyappdiv-1912.